The entire zone of Mount Hyjal is one example. Remember - original WoW had a lot of content visible on the map that was never used. I suspect we’d get the first or second option, not the third, but they’re all possible.īut there’s another path that Blizz might take: Further content development for vanilla WoW. Another option is to develop “classic” implementations of previous WoW expansions and offer Classic players the option to clone an existing hero on a BC server, move a hero from one to the other (with no option to transfer back), or roll fresh and face leveling from 1-70 under TBC rules. One is not to handle it, and to offer Classic as exactly what it is - Classic WoW, no more, no less, with all of the content and limitations that implies. I can see a few different ways for Blizzard to handle this.
The slideshow from our WoW leveling comparison (1-20) is embedded below:
Just because a game has strong elements doesn’t mean it aged particularly well, or even that people are hungry to return once again to its content. At the same time, though, I probably shouldn’t lean too hard on the strength of that argument. There’s a lot of good game in WoW Classic, which really isn’t surprising, considering it’s the game that got millions of people to play World of Warcraft. With that said, I’m still playing, even if a lot of CPU and GPU review coverage from November – February basically sidetracked my testing. Some of the shortcomings of Blizzard’s original design are apparent above Lvl 30 in ways they weren’t in the original game. It can be difficult to find enough quests to level easily. I’ve done some of the complaining, in point of fact. I’d lie if I said I hadn’t seen complaints. The funny thing about the Classic / Retail debate was the players on the Retail side of the community who were certain Classic would be filled with people doing nothing but complaining about how difficult the game was.
0 kommentar(er)
